![]() It works well enough, but I'm sure you know what a pain that method can be especially if you're switching through several banks, because you're only moving 3 at a time.Īnother small thing that makes a difference when trying moving rapidly through banks between songs is, again, the fact the MGT-4 moves in banks of 3. On the MGT-4, you bank up/down by stepping on the right/left 2 foot switches simultaneously. On the GTX-7, you click the bank selection foot switch to bank-up, and hold it to bank down, 5 at a time. The separate bank button is a "nice to have" feature. If not, I can bank up and down with the MGT-4. Since my amp is either stacked on top of the extension cab, or on an amp stand, it is easily within reach. Beyond those 3 presets, I tend to dial-up the preset I want using the encoder knob. The GTX-7 does not appear to have the QA feature. ![]() I have the 3 most-used presets (clean, vintage, distortion) saved to my Favorites setlist, and use the Quick Access function on the MGT-4 to switch among them. I tend to use one preset for any given song. If you do a lot of preset changes during a song, this may be a significant benefit to you. You can switch easily among 5 presets without having to bank up and down. Regarding advantages of the GTX-7, I think there are 4 main differences to note: I was intrigued by the GTX-7 when it was introduced, but have not been sufficiently enticed to buy it. I use the original MGT-4 with my Rumble Stage 800 playing live and in my home studio.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |